Perhaps the world vaccine conspirators figure that if people are willing to betray themselves anyway, its not much different for governments and institutions to betray them as well. Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction effort, there are really only three ways in which they might theoretically be effective from the point of view of those who wish to reduce world population: #1) They might kill people slowly. Why you should listen, bill, gates is the founder and former business School Acceptance Essay CEO of Microsoft. New England Journal of Medicine. On the Big History website, you will find a public course, offering a four-to-six hour tour of Big History.
It appears to the Differences Between Shakespeare Theatre and the have been a deliberate, calculated part of a well developed and coherent presentation. If humanity is to save itself from its own destruction and compete as an uplifted species in our universe, killing off the least intelligent members of society (or making them infertile) may appear to the world controllers to be a perfectly reasonable approach. PLoS Med 7(4 e1000259. Plus, it would save Social Security yet more billions by avoiding ongoing monthly payouts. I can only imagine that those people designing this vaccine-induced population control measure might be sitting around a table chuckling to themselves and saying, Its only the stupid people that are going to be killed off anyway, so this is actually helping the future. This soft kill method might seem more acceptable to scientists who want to see the world population fall but dont quite have the stomach to outright kill people with conventional medicine. ( m/028887_v ) It seems that the actions of the Gates foundation are entirely consistent with the formula for CO2 reduction that Bill Gates eluded to in his TED conference speech: CO2 P x S x E. Then, during an hour on the treadmill, Gates, a self-described nerd, would pass the time by watching DVDs from the Teaching Companys Great Courses series.