this language, and once again the choice for the player is to stick with the initial choice, or change to another "orthogonal" option. This would be true if the host opens a door randomly, but that is not the case; the door opened depends on the player's initial choice, so the assumption of independence doesn't hold. Another former colleague, Butler Lampsona winner of the Turing Award, the Nobel Prize of computer sciencecalls the approach completely reasonable The idea that theres no way to engineer a secure way of access is ridiculous.

In mathematics, economics, and computer science, the stable marriage problem (also stable matching problem or, sMP) is the problem of finding a stable matching between two equally sized sets of elements given an ordering of preferences for each element.

Problems give you a chance to use your brains.

Hiroyuki Hirano Thought Leader Sometimes the situation is only a problem because it is looked at in a certain way.

General Maddox m April 8, 2013.

Think about it: Apple cant access its customers databut some random company in Israel can fetch it for its paying customers? Ozzie conceded that Tromer found a flaw, but not one that couldnt be fixed. The New York Times. 105, at Google Books ) Herbranson,. They report that when the number of options is increased to more than 7 choices (7 doors people tend to switch more often; however, most contestants still incorrectly judge the probability of success at 50:50. A b c d Irving, Robert. Parade Magazine :. Vos Savant commented that, though some confusion was caused by some readers not realizing that they were supposed to assume that the host must always reveal a goat, almost all of her numerous correspondents had correctly understood the problem assumptions, and were still initially convinced. The fact that these two strategies match (at least 2/3, at most 2/3) proves that they form the minimax solution. All too often, it fails. This asymmetry of optimality is driven by the fact that the suitors have the entire set to choose from, but reviewers choose between a limited subset of the suitors at any one time.

Now, since the player initially chose door 1, the chance that the host opens door 3 is 50 if the car is behind door 1, 100 if the car is behind door 2, 0 if the car is behind door. The analysis also shows that the overall success rate of 2/3, achieved by always switching, cannot be improved, and underlines what already may well have been intuitively obvious: the choice facing the player is that between the door initially chosen, and the other door left. For example, assume the contestant knows that Monty does not pick the second door randomly among all legal alternatives but instead, when given an opportunity to pick between two losing doors, Monty will open the one on the right.

The Blitzkrieg Of World War II, Eating Disorders Problem, Bacardi, the hidden war,